Author Topic: There might not have been a Moon long time ago  (Read 3923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« on: 07 January, 2020, 12:19:43 PM »
Open quickbuttons

MsLeon

Posts: 81

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Female

    Female
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Nope I haven't lost it. ;)  I was looking-up all sorts last night and by chance found some SE results saying that there wasn't a moon a long time ago.  Some strange place somewhere in Bolivia apparently built about 11000 years ago was inhabited by people that never made references of the moon.  Crazy, right?

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #1 on: 07 January, 2020, 09:35:39 PM »
Open quickbuttons

McGaskil

Posts: 88

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Never heard of this, certainly sounds far out! :P  What is this place in Bolivia called then?

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #2 on: 09 January, 2020, 09:52:30 AM »
Open quickbuttons

A.Jenery

Posts: 59

Digital artist and photographer
Offline
  • **
  • "blag-it" Forum Standard Member
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Well this certainly got my attention it sounded so incredible, so did some SE'ing and found this site which mentions somewhere called Kalasasaya in Bolivia built about 13000 yrs ago. :o   Scroll down to third paragraph in the article.

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #3 on: 09 January, 2020, 11:32:50 AM »
Open quickbuttons

MsLeon

Posts: 81

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Female

    Female
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Well this certainly got my attention it sounded so incredible, so did some SE'ing and found this site which mentions somewhere called Kalasasaya in Bolivia built about 13000 yrs ago. :o  Scroll down to third paragraph in the article.
Same site I found! :-*   Sorry, should have said to begin with.  But what does this mean??  That 8000 years before much was recorded in biblical areas there was this Kalasasaya place that made no record of the moon?  Don't get it! :-\

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #4 on: 09 January, 2020, 01:24:53 PM »
Open quickbuttons

blag-it Admin

Posts: 566

Offline
  • Forum Admin
  • *****
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
I can see why this is surprising.  Wasn't it Henry Ford that said history is bunk?  Or something like that.  How were they able to translate any writings or symbols that they found in this 13,000 year old city to know if the moon is mentioned or not?  Thought provoking find though. ;)


Admin

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #5 on: 10 January, 2020, 04:55:58 AM »
Open quickbuttons

MsLeon

Posts: 81

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Female

    Female
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
I can see why this is surprising.  Wasn't it Henry Ford that said history is bunk?  Or something like that.  How were they able to translate any writings or symbols that they found in this 13,000 year old city to know if the moon is mentioned or not?  Thought provoking find though. ;)


Admin
Get that, for writing's anyway.  Must be some truth though to what's said on this site, right?  What about any symbols?  They're visual, don't need to translate them...  :-\

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #6 on: 10 January, 2020, 08:36:19 PM »
Open quickbuttons

ATH019

Posts: 203

Offline
  • Global Moderation
  • ***
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Many cave paintings depict stick-figures hunting animals about thirty times their size, but you don't take them literally. ;)   So I guess even symbols have to be translated in a sense.


Global Moderator

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #7 on: 12 January, 2020, 02:43:03 PM »
Open quickbuttons

cybernut

Posts: 114

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #8 on: 13 January, 2020, 07:07:50 AM »
Open quickbuttons

blag-it Admin

Posts: 566

Offline
  • Forum Admin
  • *****
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin

Re: There might not have been a Moon long time ago

« Reply #9 on: 13 January, 2020, 09:17:46 PM »
Open quickbuttons

McGaskil

Posts: 88

Offline
  • ***
  • "blag-it" Forum Higher Member
  • Gender
    Male

    Male
  • Personal Text
    Certified “blag-it” member
Just googled 'Kalasasaya no moon' and right at the top of the list it suggests 'Kalasasaya' was a temple.  The site says that the 'place' was somewhere called Tiwanaku. ???
Yes, seems you're right!  Well spotted! Some of us got our wires crossed, including me. :P  Had another good look at that site and it actually says Tiwanaku was built 13000 yrs ago, not Kalasasaya which was a temple in it!


Admin
Clears things up a bit, but doubt there was ever a period when there was no moon and then 'suddenly there was one' after some cataclysm, great flood what have you.  Do ppl have any idea what it would take to cause this?